TCRG August 20: “Hospital platforms” revisited
After our recent discussions of platforms, we return to a piece that the TCRG read in 2010: Keating and Cambrosio’s Biomedical Platforms. In this chapter, “Hospital Platforms”, the authors analyse the historical polysemy of the term “platform”, before showing how the concept of a “biomedical platform” organises architecture, clinical practice, and diagnostic technology. This chapter presents a slice of “platform sociology”, which the authors describe in the dialogue that concludes the book:
Say I want to use your platform sociology to analyze my own material, for instance, the application of molecular genetic approaches to schizophrenia. How should I go about it? Where should I begin? In other words, do you have a checklist of steps for performing platform analysis?
Well, we do not really like checklists and methodological algorithms, but here are a few indications. Start right in the middle of the game, with regulation. Look, for instance, to quality-control procedures, the meetings and discussions surrounding their development and enforcement, the formal and informal agreements in which they are grounded; from there, move up and down along the regulatory continuum, letting your investigation range from matters of equipment to clinical matters such as those discussed during consensus conferences. Then, investigate the debates and practices surrounding the redefinition of the lesion that defines the disease. Do so with a view toward specifying biomedical (i.e., normal and pathological) entities that are both the input into and the outcome of this process. Finally, look for alignments with other forms of work. You can ask yourself, for instance, how the new entities generated by the platform have been articulated with previous ones, for instance, with prior diagnostic and prognostic classifications. Does this answer your question?
We meet as usual at 5pm in the Pierre Gorman Rm, 1888 Building. All are welcome.
[PDF] Keating and Cambrosio (2003) “Hospital Platforms” Biomedical Platforms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 25-47, 235-341